It won’t matter. The genie is out of the bottle — and the enemedia, academia, and the rest of left controlled institutions will continue to persecute, smear and destroy those of us still brave enough to stand up for freedom.
100 French Intellectuals Issue A Warning About Islamic Totalitarianism
By Hugh Fitzgerald, March 21, 2018:
Story continues below advertisementA group of 100 French intellectuals has just published in the newspaper Le Figaro (March 19, 2018), its denunciation of Islamic totalitarianism. Among the signatories are some of the most distinguished historians, philosophers, professors, jurists, and journalists, in France, known to all, and representing political leanings from Left to Right. Among them are some ex-Muslims. Not a group easy to dismiss.
The following is a translation of their statement made by Leslie Shaw, a contributor to the Clarion Project:
We are citizens of differing and often diametrically opposed views, who have found agreement in expressing our concern in the face of the rise of Islamism. We are united not by our affinities, but by the feeling of danger that threatens freedom in general and not just freedom of thought.
That which unites us today is more fundamental than that which will undoubtedly separate us tomorrow.
Islamist totalitarianism seeks to gain ground by every means possible and to represent itself as a victim of intolerance. This strategy was demonstrated some weeks ago when the SUD Education 93 teachers union proposed a training course that includedworkshops on state racism from which white people were barred.
Several of the facilitators were members or sympathizers of the CCIF (French Collective Against Islamophobia) or the Natives of the Republic party. Such examples have proliferated recently. We have thus learned that the best way to combat racism is to separate races. If this idea shocks us, it is because we are Republicans.
We also hear it said that because religions in France are trampled on by an institutionalized secularism, everything that is in a minority — in other words Islam — must be accorded a special place so that it can cease to be humiliated.
This same argument continues by asserting that in covering themselves with a hijab, women are protecting themselves from men and that keeping themselves apart is a means to emancipation.
What these proclamations have in common is the idea that the only way to defend the “dominated” (the term is that of SUD Education 93) is to set them apart and grant them privileges.
Not so long ago, apartheid reigned in South Africa. Based on the segregation of blacks, it sought to exonerate itself by creating bantustans (territories set aside for black South Africans) where blacks were granted false autonomy. Fortunately this system no longer exists.
Today, a new kind of apartheid is emerging in France, a segregation in reverse thanks to which the “dominated” seek to retain their dignity by sheltering themselves from the “dominators.”
But does this mean that a woman who casts off her hijab and goes out into the street becomes a potential victim? Does it mean that a “race” that mixes with others becomes humiliated? Does it mean that a religion that accepts being one among other religions loses face?Does Islamism also seek to segregate French Muslims, whether believers or otherwise, who accept democracy and are willing to live with others? Who will decide for women who refuse to be locked away? As for others, who seemingly do not deserve to be protected, will they be held under lock and key in the camp of the “dominators”?
All of this runs counter to what has been done in France to guarantee civil peace. For centuries, the unity of the nation has been grounded in a detachment with respect to particularities that can be a source of conflict. What is known as Republican universalism does not consist in denying the existence of gender, race or religion but in defining civic space independently of them so that nobody feels excluded. How can one not see that secularism protects minority religions?
Jeopardizing secularism exposes us to a return to the wars of religion.
What purpose can this new sectarianism serve? Must it only allow the self-styled “dominated” to safeguard their purity by living amongst themselves? Is not its overall objective to assert secession from national unity, laws and mores? Is it not the expression of a real hatred towards our country and democracy?
For people to live according to the laws of their community or caste, in contempt of the laws of others, for people to be judged only by their own, is contrary to the spirit of the Republic. The French Republic was founded on the refusal to accept that private rights can be applied to specific categories of the population and on the abolition of privilege.
On the contrary, the Republic guarantees that the same law applies to each one of us.. This is simply called justice.
This new separatism is advancing under concealment. It seeks to appear benign but is in reality a weapon of political and cultural conquest in the service of Islamism.
Islamism wants to set itself apart because it rejects others, including those Muslims who do not subscribe to its tenets. Islamism abhors democratic sovereignty, to which it refuses any kind of legitimacy. Islamism feels humiliated when it is not in a position of dominance.
Accepting this is out of the question. We want to live in a world where both sexes can look at each other with neither feeling insulted by the presence of the other. We want to live in a world where women are not deemed to be naturally inferior. We want to live in a world where people can live side by side without fearing each other. We want to live in a world where no religion lays down the law.
Waleed al-Husseini, writer
Arnaud d’Aunay, painter
Pierre Avril, academic
Vida Azimi, jurist
Isabelle Barbéris, academic
Kenza Belliard, teacher
Georges Bensoussan, historian
Corinne Berron, author
Alain Besançon, historian
Fatiha Boudjahlat, essayist
Michel Bouleau, jurist
Rémi Brague, philosopher
Philippe Braunstein, historian
Stéphane Breton, film maker, ethnologist
Claire Brière-Blanchet, reporter, essayist
Marie-Laure Brossier, city councillor
Pascal Bruckner, writer
Eylem Can, script writer
Sylvie Catellin, semiologist
Gérard Chaliand, writer
Patrice Champion, former ministerial advisor
Brice Couturier, journalist
Éric Delbecque, essayist
Chantal Delsol, philosopher
Vincent Descombes, philosopher
David Duquesne, nurse
Luc Ferry, philosopher, former minister
Alain Finkielkraut, philosopher, writer
Patrice Franceschi, writer
Renée Fregosi, philosopher
Christian Frère, professor
Claudine Gamba-Gontard, professor
Jacques Gilbert, historian of ideas
Gilles-William Goldnadel, lawyer
Monique Gosselin-Noat, academic
Gabriel Gras, biologist
Gaël Gratet, professor
Patrice Gueniffey, historian
Alain Guéry, historian
Éric Guichard, philosopher
Claude Habib, writer, professor
Nathalie Heinich, sociologist
Clarisse Herrenschmidt, linguist
Philippe d’Iribarne, sociologist
Roland Jaccard, essayist
Jacques Jedwab, psychoanalyst
Catherine Kintzler, philosopher
Bernard Kouchner, doctor, humanitarian, former minister
Bernard de La Villardière, journalist
Françoise Laborde, journalist
Alexandra Laignel-Lavastine, essayist
Dominique Lanza, clinical psychologist
Philippe de Lara, philosopher
Josepha Laroche, academic
Alain Laurent, essayist, editor
Michel Le Bris, writer
Jean-Pierre Le Goff, philosopher
Damien Le Guay, philosopher
Anne-Marie Le Pourhiet, jurist
Barbara Lefebvre, teacher
Patrick Leroux-Hugon, physicist
Élisabeth Lévy, journalist
Laurent Loty, historian of ideas
Mohamed Louizi, engineer, essayist
Jérôme Maucourant, economist
Jean-Michel Meurice, painter, film director
Juliette Minces, sociologist
Marc Nacht, psychoanalyst, writer
Morgan Navarro, cartoonist
Pierre Nora, historian, editor
Robert Pépin, translator
Céline Pina, essayist
Yann Queffélec, writer
Jean Queyrat, film director
Philippe Raynaud, professor of political science
Robert Redeker, writer
Pierre Rigoulot, historian
Ivan Rioufol, journalist
Philippe San Marco, author, essayist
Boualem Sansal, writer
Jean-Marie Schaeffer, philosopher
Martine Segalen, ethnologist
André Senik, teacher
Patrick Sommier, man of the theater
Antoine Spire, vice-president of Licra
Wiktor Stoczkowski, anthropologist
Véronique Tacquin, professor, writer
Pierre-André Taguieff, political scientist
Maxime Tandonnet, author
Sylvain Tesson, writer
Paul Thibaud, essayist
Bruno Tinel, economist
Michèle Tribalat, demographer
Caroline Valentin, essayist
David Vallat, author
Éric Vanzieleghem, documentalist
Jeannine Verdès-Leroux, historian
Emmanuel de Waresquiel, historian
Ibn Warraq, writer
Yves-Charles Zarka, philosopher
Fawzia Zouari, writer
The Truth Must be Told
Your contribution supports independent journalism
Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.
Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.
Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.
Please contribute here.
or
Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.
Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.
Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.
Follow Pamela Geller on Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.
Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.
Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.
If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.
How interesting, what took these “intellectuals” so long to grasp the obvious?
fear of being Islamophobes, now when their children are raped and enslaved they can say… we waited, then we waited, then we waited more, than when it was too damned late, we put out a joint letter! See we almost tried.
I’ll bet them muzrats in France are now terrified after reading the letter of the intellectuals!
LOL, yes now they’ll be sure to reform their faith.
Because it only recently invaded their “safe spaces”?
French philosophers are a few fries short of a Happy Meal?
In france, french fries means fried brain.
100 French intellectuals? Wow, that’s pretty amazing. A little late, but better late than never.
Isn’t that one of the 1st things totalitarians do ? They get rid of the intellectuals (to Siberia).
Their long list of the obvious and 6 euros will get you a cup of bad coffee. A couple of years to late.
100 French fools pull their heads out of their crack, take a peek and become alarmed?
After 200 years of exporting Hate, one would think we’ve had enough of the French Intelligentsia.
Too late. All these warnings come decades too late.
Last year when I was eating dinner in a small restaurant in a very small village in eastern France, I was more than surprised when even there, in such a small place apparently without any significant/visible amount of muzzies, the complete menu list was pork free. I had some friends with me who don´t like beef and who asked for something with pork (as we had chicken for lunch and wanted some variety), and in the moment they asked the waiter for pork, he opened up his eyes a bit more and answered in a bit surprised voice “Nooo our restaurant is pork free”!!!!! The complete staff in the restaurant was native french (from what I could see and hear), and also all the guests except for me and my group seemed to be native french people from this village or villages around. I really didn´t expect that Sharia law already made its impact even on the smallest rural french communities with (almost?) zero muslim population! That really showed me how deeply infiltrated France already is and how its culture has submitted.
Sad. It’s like Stockholm Syndrome writ large (and in French).
Trop peu, trop tard, a mon avis; mais c’est mieux que rien dans le fond. Je n’ai pas beaucoup d’espoir pour La France a ce-moment-ci. “La soeur aignee de L’Eglise” se trouve dans un guerre enorme contre l’Islam.
Et, franchement, je pense qu’on peut arreter de pretendre qu’il existe quelque-chose d’autre que simplement “l’Islam”. Il n’y a pas de “l’Islamisme”. Qu’est-ce-que c’est ca?? Ilya tout simplement “l’Islam” comme telle. Soit honnete avec toi-meme, svp.
C´est exactement comme ca. Mais cette mensonge “d´Islamisme” est malheureusement trop basse implantée dans les cervaux francaises.
à mon avis c’est “La France est (ou plutôt ÉTAIT) la fille ainée de l’Église,(catholique)” mais je comprends ce que vous voulez dire, l’islam mene une guerre pas seulement contre la France, mais contre toute la civilisation occidentale.
Meilleurs voeux,
France used to be the eldest daughter of the catholic church and you’re right, the islam is indeed at war against France and our western values and civilization.
Best wishes to you,
E. Pérez
Unless they are prepared to fight and die, this is pointless and far too late. Anyone wish to bet on how many of those names are prepared to die fighting for Liberty?
The spirit of jean Paul Sartre’s pet monkey lives on.
Arm yourselves comrades and let the streets of Paris run with ink!
get a mirror …!!
what do you think the hijab ban … islamic/religious symbol ban ….. burkini ban ???
are you not already totalitarian ??
You don’t like those things banned…..get out of the west and go back to the desert and practice all the sharia you want back there….
thanks for admitting that you are totalitarian …
Opposing the fascism that is islum isn’t totalitarian muslum chimp, it’s resistance.
It’s a resistance ??????
absolutely !!!!!!
Resistance against hijabi motherhood women are far more brave and manly acts ,,,
…. than resistance of Gazan people against occupier land stealer Zionist high tech army ….
hehehehehehehehehehehehehehe ……..
Your fellow Gazan muslum vermin regularly attack Israel w/rockets and mortar rounds (well over ten thousand this century) they reap what they sow and the reapings good.
did gazan do it just for fun ???
i didn’t know gazan people did it purely just for fun …..
You do your goat just for fun, since you can not procreate with your goat…..
a society can’t be at the state of freedom forever … It’s a state of emptiness …..
one day they need to go down to earth …..
they need to do ‘landing’ ..
they need to use their freedom to make a ‘choose’ ….
thats why islam is coming …
It almost seems like you’re saying freedom and islum are incompatible eh indonesian muslum chimp?
yep …
….. western butt h*les lifestyles and muslim’s life are incompatible …
I had a cynical snigger at the headline, not to be disparaging, but 100 French intellectuals?? Still, they are far smarter than any Swedish, German, or British intellectuals, as none of them seem to have grasped the situation in their respective countries, let alone make any declaration about it.
I’ve been waiting for a similar group to get it together over here. Maybe this will be a catalyst.
Definitely! I can see hordes of Brickies and scaffolders etc following the brave intellectuals into battle on the streets of the UK. NOT!!!
FFS! I do hope you was joking James.
FcK the intellectuals!
It was this type of over superior idiot that would have welcomed the muzrat to France in the first place in the name of cultural diversity.
PROSCRIBE ISLAM!
France has intellectuals?? Do they even need intellectuals to understand a DINGBAT problem that is understood by even the rubbish man?
Wow, France is in a lot of trouble, indeed!
Have some respect for their bravery AC. They are willing to sacrifice their own ink on our behalf!!!
Combat racism by seperating races?
You STILL don’t get it. This is war, your enemy is pisslam (and those who follow it). Anything short of this will not serve your pupose of destroying it.
F- pisslam.
This letter by these courageous intellectuals who sacrifice their ink for our freedom Is sure to strike terror into the heart of the muzrat savage beast.
They will be surrendering in thousands at the very mention of it.
As we speak an elite Corp of French intellectuals are arming themselves with pens pencils and word processors to take this battle to the library’s and coffe shops within enemy territory.
We can now all breathe easy!
Gonna take a lot more than100 gonna take most of France now to run the invader out.
Too little, too late. The French are basically dead. So are the Germans, Swedes, Norwegians, and many other once European countries. The filth that let them in should be hung. They should have let in plague filled rats, instead (at least that would be a curable problem).
Bit late for you frogs to start croaking now. You should have voted for Marine le Pen who would have done her best to reverse this mess your in.
Next time more vote wisely.
PROSCRIBE ISLAM!
I agree!
Also sounds like George Orwell’s double speak from his prophetic book 1984 which of course should have been more realistically titled 2024.
Look Out you Muzrats!!!
The French intellectuals are coming!!!
And their armed with a very stiff letter.
Grab your koran’s and run for the beaches!!!
MERDE!!!!
Islam is not about living side by side………………….it is about domination.
Wake up to yourselves.
Unfortunately you only have 1400 years of continuous slavery, persecution and slaughter of the unbeliever in islum to backup your statement — and that’s hardly enough evidence if you’re a liberal!
Haaahaaar France may end up like the former Yugoslavia
too late les intellectuels
The commentators are right, it is way late to grasp this and every day of delay increases the risk and cost of correcting this mistake. The stakes are absolute.
This is welcome news but…….I’m not sure it will make a difference at this late date. ):